| 1 |
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:34:50 +0100 |
| 2 |
Manuel Lauss wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> David, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I suggest you post this question to linux-kernel@×××××××××××.org and |
| 7 |
> linux-serial@×××××××××××.org |
| 8 |
> instead. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> One question though: does your target have a real (physically real) |
| 11 |
> uart chip? There are some x86 systems out there which emulate a 8250 |
| 12 |
> through SMM code, which exhibit these kinds of failures at high baud |
| 13 |
> rates. Do lower baudrates work? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Best regards, |
| 16 |
> Manuel Lauss |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Hello Manuel, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The UARTs are real and work very very well with DOS (remember the 2.5 |
| 21 |
errors per 1000 records). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The high speed serial device has a fixed 115KB rate and is |
| 24 |
transferring 4000+ characters per second. With the fixed baud rate, |
| 25 |
lower baudrates aren't usable, hence can't be tested. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
David |
Archives