Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Filip Joelsson <filip@××××××××××××.se>
To: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Problems with uclibc stage1
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:55:26
Message-Id: 1095066289.5510.39.camel@tadeus.bebistrallarna
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Problems with uclibc stage1 by Mike Frysinger
1 mån 2004-09-13 klockan 02.48 skrev Mike Frysinger:
2 > On Sunday 12 September 2004 04:05 pm, Filip Joelsson wrote:
3 > > !!! Problem in >=sys-apps/portage-2.0.50-r8 dependencies.
4 > > !!! [Errno 38] Function not implemented:
5 > > '/var/cache/edb/dep//sys-apps/portage-2.0.50-r9'
6 >
7 > what if you `rm -rf /var/cache/edb/dep` ? it's just a cache dir and will be
8 > regenerated next time you run portage (the portage command will just take
9 > longer the first time since there's no cache anymore)
10
11 Nope, it starts out saying:
12 >>> /var/cache/edb/dep doesn't exist, creating it...
13 And from then on it's exactly the same output.
14
15 > i just tested your script on my pentium4 x86 and on an amd64 opteron and didnt
16 > have any probs :/
17
18 Ok, that makes it look like it could be a hardware problem, or at least
19 that's what I thought first. But this is the second P2 I try to install
20 on. I wonder if it could something in /proc that looks wrong.
21
22 The error code I get:
23 [Errno 38] Function not implemented:
24 /var/cache/edb/dep//sys-apps/portage-2.0.50-r9
25 Is that python related?
26
27 Oh, and I checked that the file was there, and it was. Could you look at
28 it and check if it contains anything wrong? (attached)
29
30 TIA
31 /Filip

Attachments

File name MIME type
portage-2.0.50-r9 text/plain

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] Problems with uclibc stage1 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>