1 |
> Hi David, |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 10:16 -0400 schrieb Relson, David: |
4 |
> [...] |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Over the past month I've encountered numerous "Stale NFS file handle" |
7 |
> > errors. The device isn't networked and there's no apparent reason for |
8 |
> > them (as best I can tell). |
9 |
> |
10 |
> i had the same problems on a (i think it was ext2) root-filesystem which |
11 |
> was never written to, but was also not mounted ro. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> i thought that i would not need the fsck on boot up, because there are |
14 |
> no write accesses to the device ... |
15 |
> |
16 |
> however after some months of operation the device failed to boot with |
17 |
> exact the same error message ... |
18 |
> |
19 |
> the reason i suspect was that due to power failures the ext2 got |
20 |
> inconsistent somehow ... which resulted in "stale NFS file handle |
21 |
> messages" ... not very intuitive ;) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> i put in a check & repair of the filesystem (with -y) on every boot and |
24 |
> now those errors are gone ... |
25 |
> |
26 |
> i think the problem encounters when a not cleanly shut down ext2 fs gets |
27 |
> mounted over and over again ... and ... maybe something got written to |
28 |
> it even if i would not know ... it was a mini-itx running gentoo |
29 |
> with /var (mostly) on another (rw) partition - but not very "embedded" |
30 |
> in terms of stripped down ... ;) |
31 |
> |
32 |
> hope this helps, |
33 |
> marcus. |
34 |
|
35 |
Stale NFS socket you say.... those meant my custom compilation past away, as |
36 |
the filesystem became unusable. I've chopped the flash and bought new one. |
37 |
|
38 |
Until now, I've managed to kill several flashes. Apparently they're not so |
39 |
wearproof as vendors say. This could be coincidence, but all of them were |
40 |
Kingstons with lifetime warranty. |
41 |
|
42 |
can I include screenshot here? I mange my Personal Collection of Failures (TM) |
43 |
and I've got screenshot of this failure too :-)) |