| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I'm currently working in HRT applications, for several years, just |
| 5 |
using Linux (and other applications off course). |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
What is the big question over here after all? decide what is HRT or SRT? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Currently is possible to use FOSS and have determinism on a nanosecond |
| 10 |
area. Do you that is not much? A satellite clock synchronizer costs |
| 11 |
millions of dollars and even that has a drift (i know that is has a |
| 12 |
lot of zeros, but the drift exists). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So to have HRT in gentoo you just need a couple of ebuilds of RTAI, |
| 15 |
RTnet, and not much more. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Regards |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
P.S.: Sorry if i said something out of context. I didn't quite |
| 22 |
understand how this discussion started. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
2007/1/14, momentics <momentics@×××××.com>: |
| 26 |
> > Does anyone know of any Hard Real Time Systems, |
| 27 |
> > where deterministic response is required, that work |
| 28 |
> > with Gentoo-Embedded? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> sorry Bob - James and I are in theoretical aspects... :-) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> had you considered RealTime subprj of Gentoo Embedded? |
| 33 |
> probably gents have something already? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> obviously - that currently is impossible in modern kernels, but |
| 36 |
> probably some old ones, folks can adopt to be more deterministic - |
| 37 |
> a-la Neutrino :) |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> btw - that's for my own - what do you need to build that requires a hrt? |
| 40 |
> -- |
| 41 |
> gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives