Re: [gentoo-embedded] 2 missing files from portage tree

[Peter S. Mazinger]

On 29 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 10:37, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:
> >
> > > You might want to look over the uclibc build itself. looks like theres a
> > > few cases in which the SYS_LIBC wont be defined namely inside of the
> > > src_compile(), src_install() where no calls to check_main_libc() are
> > > made.
> >
>
>
> > Would you solve this some other way, or should we use only use uclibc (if
> > it is set, we are building natively, else in glibc env)?
>
> Well I'm trying to approach this with you from a glibc->uclibc
> conversion so that would mean that this line in the check_main_libc()
> wont ever be triggered.
> [ -f /lib/lib${MY_P}.so -a ! -f /lib/libc.so.6 ]
>
> Now if I recall there's a check in one of these patches that does some
> greping of the headers for __UCLIBC__
> Maybe the check does /include/asm/bits.h (?)

we could also check for the file /usr/include/bits/uClibc_config.h (like config.guess)
and if it is there, we assume uclibc is the main lib. (I think __UCLIBC__ 
is also coming from there, haven't checked)

Peter


--
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list