Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
Cc: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o, base-system@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-embedded] Re: portage profiles for alternatives (uclibc)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:38:51
Message-Id: 200406102038.46708.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-embedded] Re: portage profiles for alternatives (uclibc) by "Peter S. Mazinger"
1 On Thursday 10 June 2004 05:32 pm, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
2 > how to handle for ex. tar's case:
3 > tar requires: app-arch/gzip, app-arch/bzip2, app-arch/ncompress
4
5 put these entries into your profile and see if it works:
6 app-arch/gzip sys-apps/busybox
7 app-arch/bzip2 sys-apps/busybox
8 app-arch/ncompress sys-apps/busybox
9
10 side note, i thought the included gzip with busybox had some known bugs (at
11 least the latest 1.00) ? :)
12
13 > Apropos gzip: why are the virtuals not used that already exist (there is a
14 > virtual/gzip also virtual/dev-manager instead of sys-fs/devfsd)
15
16 the virtual's are used in the stacked profiles ... the idea was to switch over
17 to the stacked profiles quickly and thus not have to maintain all the other
18 old profiles since they're a pain
19
20 > ok, I understand this, but for the build system itself autoconf is not
21 > present, so can't run it either, and have to provide the result of
22 > autoconf as patch, so it should not be in the packages.build file at all
23
24 true enough, but i still said you can remove packages from the profile in the
25 stackable world :P
26
27 > do you mean using
28 > -<package>
29 > This is supposed to work only w/ the stackable structure, right?
30
31 yes ... if it doesnt, file a bug
32 -mike
33
34 --
35 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] Re: portage profiles for alternatives (uclibc) David Bryson <david@×××××××××.com>
[gentoo-embedded] Re: portage profiles for alternatives (uclibc) "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>