Archives
Archives
| From: | Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-embedded@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic | ||
| Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:03:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | BANLkTin9yHq8srmO5NBiJ=GKquZV=YC=yw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic by Arkadi Shishlov |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Arkadi Shishlov |
| 2 | <arkadi.shishlov@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > What is the (long-term) technical advantage to use bionic, compared to glibc |
| 4 | > and uclibc? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | There really is little technical advantage over glibc or uclibc. Most |
| 7 | would probably argue the opposite. For most embedded applications, I |
| 8 | would actually suggest using uclibc instead of bionic. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | The (short- and long-term) advantage really just lies in the license. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic | Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@×××××.com> |