| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'm working getting open-iscsi to work with uclibc. I actually got it |
| 4 |
working with some hacks. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
what I did was to comment out the code that checks if harware address |
| 7 |
corresponds to net device. It uses getifaddrs which is not implemented |
| 8 |
in uclibc. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Second was lots of use of scandir(...., versionsort). I implemented |
| 11 |
versionsort (and strverscmp) in uclibc and sent a patch to uclibc list. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On a second thought, I'm not so sure that we really want have lots on |
| 14 |
non-POSIX things in uclibc. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So my question is, should we try patching each package that uses those |
| 17 |
non-implemented, non-POSIX things or shoudl we try to add those funcs to |
| 18 |
uclibc? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I have prepared an uclibc-0.9.28.3-r2 with updated sys/queue.h (only |
| 21 |
macros), updated netdb.h (adding some defines so gawk will compile |
| 22 |
again) and an implementaiton of strverscmp and versionsort. I'm just not |
| 23 |
sure if we want the strverscmp and versionsort in there. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Should I add get/freeifaddrs too? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-nc |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives