1 |
On Monday, January 03, 2011 07:17:35 Christoph Spielmann wrote: |
2 |
> Am 03.01.2011 10:21, schrieb Kfir Lavi: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
4 |
> > On Sunday, January 02, 2011 13:59:43 Peter Stuge wrote: |
5 |
> > > Kfir Lavi wrote: |
6 |
> > > > crossdev i686-gentoo.edge-linux-gnu |
7 |
> > > > CBUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > I'm pretty sure you should use i686-pc-linux-gnu as the crossdev |
10 |
> > > tuple then. I don't think making up arbitrary tuples works. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > (gentoo.edge) |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > the vendor field is supposed to be arbitrary and the only char |
15 |
> > that should |
16 |
> > cause a split is a "-". not that we test every char though, so |
17 |
> > there might be |
18 |
> > bugs sitting around that most people dont notice. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > I tried it again running |
21 |
> > crossdev i686-gentoo-linux-gnu |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Once again, wrong vendor field: It really should be i686-pc-linux-gnu as |
24 |
> Mike suggested |
25 |
|
26 |
mmm i didnt suggest that. there really isnt such a thing as "wrong" vendor |
27 |
field -- it's supposed to be pretty flexible. we use "gentoo" for the vendor |
28 |
field with all uclibc targets for example. |
29 |
-mike |