1 |
* Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
Hi, |
4 |
|
5 |
> I've been toying with an idea after seeing a patch which would abort() |
6 |
> when it detected host includes for cross compiles. |
7 |
|
8 |
Funny idea, sorts out the dozens of crap makefiles easily (eg. written |
9 |
by those mindless jerks who refuse to learn not to use absolute pathes |
10 |
or explicitly add standard includes). |
11 |
|
12 |
> I did not like the idea of aborting as it prevented me from building |
13 |
> pkgs that had the same headers in $ROOT as /. |
14 |
|
15 |
sucessfully shot yourself ? ;-o |
16 |
|
17 |
> Basic goal detect ^/usr/include and rewrite it to $ROOT/usr/include if |
18 |
> using a cross compiler and ROOT is set. |
19 |
|
20 |
#1: why not using the more standard and well-known $SYSROOT variable ? |
21 |
|
22 |
#2: why not just using the already existing '=' prefix ? |
23 |
|
24 |
#3: WTH do you explicitly add an standard include path like |
25 |
/usr/include ?! It's automatically done by gcc nothings an |
26 |
individual application has to cope with. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
cu |
30 |
-- |
31 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
32 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
33 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
34 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
35 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
36 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
37 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
38 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |