Re: [gentoo-embedded] Problems compiling sandbox with uclibc

[Ed W]

Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 17:15 +0100, Ed W wrote:
>
>> Ned Ludd wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:30 +0100, Ed W wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> and readelf gives me:
>>>>>
>>>>> 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.0]
>>>>> 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [ld-uClibc.so.0]
>>>>>
>>>>> Which in turn leads to the multiple line output
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Is no one else seeing this with a uclibc based system?  Why am I special...?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This is more suited in https://bugs.gentoo.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> As per previous email, see:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275725
>>
>> I have submitted a patch there which seems safe, but not having many
>> uclibc systems to compare I just wanted to get a sense of whether my
>> toolchain is building things incorrectly versus actually needing this
>> patch
>>
>> Perhaps you could kindly run "readelf -d" on some binary in your
>> uclibc system and tell me if you have the "ld-uClibc.so" listed?  If
>> so then I think the patch is sensible and required (and likely a safe
>> commit)
>>
>
> uClibc bin # readelf -d /bin/ls | grep libc
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.0]
>
> uClibc bin # qlist -eo sandbox | scanelf -f - -nB
> ET_DYN libc.so.0,libdl.so.0 /usr/lib/libsandbox.so
> ET_DYN libc.so.0 /usr/bin/sandbox
> --
>
> uClibc bin # qlist -ICv sandbox gcc binutils uclibc -e
> sys-apps/sandbox-1.9
> sys-devel/binutils-2.19.1-r1
> sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2
> sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r1
> sys-devel/gcc-4.3.3-r2
> sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.30.1-r1
>
>
>
>

Hmm, so it looks like something in my setup

Can you speculate why I might be getting this extra lib linked??

Thanks

Ed W