| 1 |
On Friday 14 July 2006 08:25, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:28:06 -0400 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the |
| 6 |
> > > > mail could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ? |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > no, i had it killed |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > > or Does an |
| 11 |
> > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ? |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > your e-mailing the new list now |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Can you please add the list back. |
| 16 |
> > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Perhaps a more general gentoo-cross list would be better, for all |
| 19 |
> cross-building efforts using glibc. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
i dont really see much use in forking mailing lists when we see small traffic |
| 22 |
on each one ... it isnt like it's confusing to pick through ... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
maybe one day when we grow larger, but atm i think we think we're bigger than |
| 25 |
we really are ;) |
| 26 |
-mike |
Archives