1 |
> > We're kicking around the idea of creating profile(s) for the systems, |
2 |
> > which would obviously have the bare minimum for operation and would be |
3 |
> > using uClibc. |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> I'd suggest you use glibc at the moment. A uClibc-based build will be |
6 |
> incompatible with all the pre-existing binaries. |
7 |
|
8 |
I think it's very worthwhile to support both glibc and uclibc (and maybe |
9 |
dietlibc). Not all embedded systems have very tight space constraints. |
10 |
I'm working on a system here that I'm going to have 64meg of flash for |
11 |
the system. I don't need to get all that tight. |
12 |
|
13 |
--Justin |