Re: [gentoo-embedded] uclibc don't compile with USE="hardened"

[Ned Ludd]

Another uclibc user on irc said this probably stems from using 2.6.x
headers. 
My uclibc hardened toolchain is built with 2.4.x headers.

On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 18:25, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2004 16:46:32 -0400
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote:
>
> > I've run into this when using spanky's stages.
> > Oddly enough it does not happen for me when I started with the
> > initial hardened stage1 from Peter, nor any time I remerge uclibc and
> > I use the hardened exclusively. Anyway chances of a user getting
> > his/her userland correct when using a non hardened-uclibc stage are
> > probably slim, unless your willing to recompile everything a few
> > times. The default method in the future will be to start from a
> > hardened-uclibc stage.
>
> To be honest, I dont *really* know what the hardened USE flag does. I
> tried to find some docs on that but could not find anything really.
>
> I'm testing out uClibs gentoo as a framework or build environment for
> building a bering (http://leaf.sf.net) like cdrom. (you boot a kernel
> and provide a list of runtime packages that are extracted into ram and
> then you run) Now I use gentoo (glibc) on my dektop and runs a chrooted
> uclibc gentoo therein. Will I need to run a hardened kernel to be able
> to build my cd?
>
> > Anyway if you want a binary pkgs of a hardened uclibc toolchain I can
> > post them for you.  From then on you should be able to recompile your
> > world correctly.
>
> That would be nice.
>
> > Oh and let me know when you have a patch that fixes this.
>
> s/when/if/ :)
>
> I guess I have to start with finding out what the hardened USE flag
> really does... any links to start with? I'll do some investigation
> tomorrow morning.
>
> --
> Natanael Copa
>
> --
> gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer