1 |
Ed W wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>>> You appear to be using KMail which supports html mail just fine... |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> which ive disabled so i dont have to deal with it. replies/quoting easily |
8 |
>> break and destroy followups. all so people can force their preferred viewing |
9 |
>> font on others. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Actually, getting all technical on you for a moment, but at least in |
13 |
> theory HTML has the ability to properly support replies and quoting as |
14 |
> part of it's standard |
15 |
> |
16 |
> ...Absolutely with you though that the most popular MUA in most circles |
17 |
> is Outlook and this fails even to reply and create a proper indent let |
18 |
> alone using decent use of HTML tags... Oh well. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Ed, |
22 |
|
23 |
This is an embedded technical list, most are avid Linux supporters if |
24 |
not Gentoo directly. It is a common convention to post without html, |
25 |
as it does cause folks to spend time on things they ordinarily would |
26 |
not. I "hate" html email and many technical folks will just ignore your |
27 |
postings. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> Not really sure what Thunderbird does - it prompts sometimes and |
32 |
> othertimes does it's own thing.. Hope this is plain text? |
33 |
> |
34 |
>> if you want to make the argument on a non-technical list, go for it. open |
35 |
>> source technical lists (such as this one) have all banned html. get with it |
36 |
>> or dont post. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> I already nailed my colours to the mast as someone who cares (remember I |
40 |
> serve customers with only 20KB/minute of bandwidth!) - I was pointing |
41 |
> out that this debate pops up time and time again and basically it's like |
42 |
> trying to hold back the tide... |
43 |
> |
44 |
> For what it's worth I have a very clever filtering setup as part of my |
45 |
> ISP arrangement which simply automatically converts html to plain text |
46 |
> and archives the original so that you can get it back again if you need |
47 |
> it, etc. I think if you really want plain text only then it's far |
48 |
> easier to just setup the mailing list to convert all mails automatically |
49 |
> than it is to try and badger users to change their habits... |
50 |
|
51 |
Again, no body usually wants to spend their time on such matters. |
52 |
Folks will just ignore you, or ban you from the list (are you listening ?) |
53 |
|
54 |
> |
55 |
> Personally I think this is a problem solvable by computer and I'm all in |
56 |
> favour of stuff where teh computer does the work rather than humans |
57 |
> having to press one more key just to do something (which is basically |
58 |
> also your complaint). I can point you towards some html flattener |
59 |
> software if you are the admin for this list? |
60 |
|
61 |
I agree with the other posters. NO HTML EMAILs. |
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
James |
66 |
-- |
67 |
gentoo-embedded@l.g.o mailing list |