1 |
Ed W wrote: |
2 |
> However, I can't actually see where LIBC_VERSION is even used? Is |
3 |
> there someone here who understands what is happening and can recommend |
4 |
> the best fix? (Remove the whole test?) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> How come no one else is seeing this? What does readelf give for |
7 |
> others using uclibc? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Ed W |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
Hmm, now I see it's used in libsandbox/wrappers.c |
13 |
|
14 |
So in order to fix this, which of the two options should *really* be |
15 |
used? Is it enough to change the test to exclude one? Is my system |
16 |
unusual in listing two similarly named files? |
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks |
19 |
|
20 |
Ed W |