1 |
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 20:05, david@×××××××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> I think you mentioned this on gentoo-dev but I'll bring it up here... |
3 |
> |
4 |
> For these embedded systems it would be nice if we had a |
5 |
> baselayout-lite. I'm not convinced every init script for these tiny |
6 |
> processors needs to source 300+ lines of bash functions to just |
7 |
> provide colors and [ ok ] symbols ;-) |
8 |
|
9 |
I think we all agree on this :) |
10 |
|
11 |
The current baselayout is there to fulfill a different purpose than what |
12 |
Gentoo-embedded aims for. There is a lot of overhead and bulkiness with |
13 |
the current baselayout for an embedded project. Just think of the |
14 |
dependencies it has on gawk, bash, and some other stuff. Also I am |
15 |
wondering whether the current init scripts are too much for an embedded |
16 |
system. Maybe a much simpler init system is needed for embedded. Dont |
17 |
know. |
18 |
|
19 |
What I think this project should aim though, is to somehow categorize |
20 |
and have subprojects which in turn each of them would require different |
21 |
sets of baselayout (full, lite), libc (glibc, uClibc/dieltlibc), etc... |
22 |
|
23 |
Regards, |
24 |
|
25 |
Vano. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |