| 1 |
On 27 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 05:42, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 26 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > > Please test with this patch. If it works for you then I'll open a bug |
| 7 |
> > > and request the dev-portage@ team cvs commit it. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > it works for me |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> great... I was thinking that maybe the logic should be inverted from an |
| 12 |
> "no"autoFEATURE to an autoFEATURE. The logic there would be. Reduce the |
| 13 |
> number of bugs that could arise from the change. (ie only people who opt |
| 14 |
> for such behavior will want it anyway) And not to override changes made |
| 15 |
> by a previous call to gnuconfig_update. Seem sane? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I can't see why it should introduce bugs, there are only new archs/configs |
| 18 |
that are added to these files. |
| 19 |
We could change a little bit the patch for config.guess so it won't |
| 20 |
influence anything (now it could produce problems on arch/os not being |
| 21 |
arch-linux-[gnu,uclibc]*, but do you want to support such combinations?) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Peter |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives