Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
Cc: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] portage 2.0.50 and uclibc
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 10:05:31
Message-Id: 1078567129.2878.21.camel@simple
In Reply to: [gentoo-embedded] portage 2.0.50 and uclibc by "Peter S. Mazinger"
1 On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 15:41, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
2 > Hello!
3 >
4 > Are there some known problems with portage 2.0.50?
5 > Since about pre10, it segfaults if building against uclibc.
6
7 Where does it segfault? Got a core?
8
9 >
10 > Any thoughts, or whom should I contact?
11
12 Best to open a bug at bugs.gentoo for tracking. I think embedded@,
13 dev-portage@, base-system@ should be on it. Who fixes shrug. probably
14 SpanKY aka vaiper@ will be the man as I think he dabbles in all there of
15 the mentioned groups.
16
17 >
18 > Thanks, Peter
19 --
20 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
21 Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] portage 2.0.50 and uclibc "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>