Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-embedded
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@...>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:37:12 +0100 (CET)
On 9 Dec 2003, Ned Ludd wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:43, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> > 
> > > hi Peter,
> > > 
> > > would you be able to submit your finale patches for the uclibc you
> > > modified?
> > 
> > You could wait a little, the pie patches could go into 0.9.24 (if Erik 
> > will do it), else take the patches I have sent to the uclibc list 
> > yesterday as tar.bz2 (not the separated ones sent earlier). The flipturn 
> > patch from gentoo is mostly included into uClibc cvs, the remaining part 
> > is attached.
> > I am enforcing NOELFRELOCS like behaviour in uClibc (I have it in 
> > PaX/grsec too like this), this could not be conformant to what you want 
> > to do. Really tested is the config with CTOR_DTOR enabled, the disabled 
> > version works on "Hello world" as ET_DYN, no other tests done.
> > 
> > > I would love to include it in the Gentoo uclibc to make it able to be 
> > > used with our unique propolice implementation!
> > The propolice implementation is what you've done with move-to-glibc, not 
> > the new ssp_x86 (waiting further more for an answer on the file you've 
> > sent me ;-( )
> > 
> > I have also sent all my specs/patches (not really sorted) for reference to 
> > solar (3.5MB compressed), he will probably put them online, all were 
> > tested with ET_DYN/propolice.
> 
> I mirrored your work to this location some time ago.
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/rpm_specs/
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/gcc-etdyn-3.3.x.specs.diff

Haven't you got the new ones (with patches too)?

Peter

> 
> > 
> > > Thanks very much in advance,
> > > 
> > > Alexander
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:23, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry for cross-posting, 
> > > > 
> > > > I have rebuilt a full system (x86) with uClibc and hardened-gcc 
> > > > (ET_DYN/PIE and stack-protection 3.3.2-5) binaries and booted into it 
> > > > (kernel built with -fstack-protector). Only the packages with assembler 
> > > > code have problems with ET_DYN/PIE, grub has problems with 
> > > > stack-protection.
> > > > 
> > > > Peter
> > > 
> 

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m@...>   ID: 0xA5F059F2    NIC: IXUYHSKQLI
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2


____________________________________________________________________
Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol.
Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu

--
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
-- Ned Ludd
References:
Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
-- Ned Ludd
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Previous by date:
Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Next by date:
Advantech PCM-3350, linux box, boot from CF


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-embedded mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.