From: | Douglas Campos <qmx2352@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-embedded@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM | ||
Date: | Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:14:48 | ||
Message-Id: | 43677803.3060008@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM by Ned Ludd |
1 | Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 | |
3 | >On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:34 -0200, Douglas Campos wrote: |
4 | > |
5 | > |
6 | >>I've heard 6 months ago that this combination wasn't possible. |
7 | >> |
8 | >>Is it true today? |
9 | >> |
10 | >> |
11 | >> |
12 | > |
13 | > |
14 | >Its doable with .28 but the upgrade paths from .27 are not so smooth. |
15 | > |
16 | > |
17 | > |
18 | > |
19 | >>Thanx |
20 | >> |
21 | >> |
22 | is there any big caveats? as far as i know, .28 is hardmasked by |
23 | profile, but don't know why :( |
24 | |
25 | |
26 | -- |
27 | gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |