1 |
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:47 +0100, Dimitris Lampridis wrote: |
2 |
> I want to build a cross toolchain on an x86 system, to be able to |
3 |
> compile for SPARC without hardware floating point support, using uclibc. |
4 |
> I've done some attempts already but they all fail (for various reasons). |
5 |
> Up until now, I have not succeeded 100%. So I thought I should do it in |
6 |
> the proper way, starting from the beginning: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Could you please let me know if there is a specific combination of |
9 |
> binutils, gcc, uclibc etc., that is well-known to work for a |
10 |
> sparc-softfloat-linux-uclibc target? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> thank you in advance, |
13 |
> Dimitris |
14 |
> |
15 |
> PS: I currently try with: |
16 |
> binutils-2.17 |
17 |
> gcc-4.1.1-r3 |
18 |
> linux-headers-2.6.19.2-r1 |
19 |
> uclibc-0.9.28-r2 |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
nobody yet? Well, I've been trying several combinations of the programs, |
23 |
and they still all fail. I've had success with binutils-2.17, with gcc |
24 |
3.4.1-r3, 3.4.4-r1 and 4.1.1-r3, but no luck with uclibc. |
25 |
|
26 |
I've tried uclibc 0.9.28-r2, 0.9.28-r1 and 0.9.28 (as well as 0.9.27 |
27 |
that apparently does not support sparc?), and every time they fail on |
28 |
the same problem, complaining about duplicate "_start" symbol in ldso.c. |
29 |
I've attached my uclibc emerge log, hopefully someone can propose |
30 |
something? |
31 |
|
32 |
thank you, |
33 |
Dimitris |