Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-embedded
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-embedded@g.o
From: david@...
Subject: Re: Welcome
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:57:19 -0800
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:40:39PM -0600, nDiScReEt wrote:
> <snip>
> I'd suggest you use glibc at the moment.  A uClibc-based build will be
> incompatible with all the pre-existing binaries.
> 
> p.
> <snip>
> 

Well that's all find and dandy in the binary distro world.  But we're
gentoo people ;-) binaries ? rpms ? debs ? I jedi craves not these
things.

uClibc does not "gaurantee" binary compatability among releases.  Some
of the releases keep it, some don't.  I don't think it would be a big
deal to have a flag in the ebuilds that said "ABI has changed,
recompile all packages"

The storage savings in embedded systems with uClibc is worth FAR
more(to me) than the occasionaly total system recompile.  Especially
if distcc gets to the point where you can distcc your cross
compiles....</wish>
Dave

--
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: Welcome
-- tserra
References:
Welcome
-- Chris PeBenito
Re: Welcome
-- nDiScReEt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Welcome
Next by thread:
Re: Welcome
Previous by date:
Re: Welcome
Next by date:
uClibc vs. Glibc


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-embedded mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.