| 1 |
Just in case anyone is interested, I just put up an |
| 2 |
arm-softfloat-linux-bioniceabi toolchain that I've had lying around |
| 3 |
for a while. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I've only tested it for very simple ebuilds, so if it grows 1000 feet |
| 6 |
tall, breathes fire, and destroys your city, I take no responsibility. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-bionic/downloads/list |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
C |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Christopher Friedt |
| 13 |
<chrisfriedt@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 14 |
> I'm almost inclined to think it's an ISA issue, but I guess it's |
| 15 |
> impossible to know where a SIGILL is coming from until it's run |
| 16 |
> through gdb. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I don't actually have gdb up and running yet, unfortunately, but |
| 19 |
> that's the route I would take. I believe they both use a version of |
| 20 |
> libiberty that needs to be patched, and I could probably recycle some |
| 21 |
> of the same patches I used for gcc-4.6. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I'll keep you informed. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> C |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 28 |
>> Christopher Friedt wrote: |
| 29 |
>>> I just set up a new vmware image runing gentoo (i686) and didn't run |
| 30 |
>>> into any of the illegal instruction issues that you mentioned. |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> I'll send you my kernel. I ran on a Thinkpad X40, Pentium-M. |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> //Peter |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
> |
Archives