1 |
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: |
2 |
> There were some kind of conflict some time ago related to NLS in |
3 |
> glibc-2. It resulted in glibc-2 got masked. |
4 |
|
5 |
You mean glib2 vs glibc? |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
> Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? |
9 |
|
10 |
Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. |
11 |
This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem |
12 |
moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. |
13 |
|
14 |
> Are the problems solved in uclibc-0.9.28? |
15 |
|
16 |
Yes & No. |
17 |
.28 has better support and could probably handle it. |
18 |
ie built in iconv() handling and basic locales handling. |
19 |
It's just not very ideal or mature at all. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
solar <solar@g.o> |
24 |
Gentoo Linux |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |