1 |
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 12:28, Daniel Glaser wrote: |
2 |
> After long traceback, I found, that glibc and gcc have problems with |
3 |
> softfloat. (for glibc --without-fp is the right configure option for |
4 |
> my system, but currently it is not directly supportet by the ebuild, |
5 |
> got it in through EXTRA_ECONF="--without-fp") |
6 |
|
7 |
if you use a target of *-softfloat-* the glibc ebuild will add --without-fp |
8 |
and the gcc ebuild will add --with-float=soft |
9 |
|
10 |
> Another thing is, that -msoft-float and -mlong-double-128 are not |
11 |
> supported (many many warnings), but used within the Gentoo ebuild. |
12 |
> Perhaps -m128bit-soft-float is the one the programmers wanted, but in |
13 |
> my opinion it is also not the right choice. |
14 |
|
15 |
the Gentoo ebuild does nothing of the sort ... this is all in the glibc build |
16 |
system itself |
17 |
|
18 |
glibc-2.4 on ppc will require gcc-4.1.x ... anything older is not supported |
19 |
and i certainly wont waste any time on it |
20 |
|
21 |
> The Problems with glibc(2.4) and gcc (4.1.1 and 4.2) are discussed in |
22 |
> this bugreport http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2749. |
23 |
> Some patches are also discussed and attached in this bugreport. |
24 |
|
25 |
well, once upstream settles on something i have no problem cutting a patch |
26 |
from their cvs and putting into our glibc-2.4 patchset ... but i wouldnt |
27 |
really want to do anything until they've settled on a solution first |
28 |
-mike |