| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> seems like catalyst feedback should go to the catalyst/release list. |
| 6 |
> >> not sure posting here will change anything. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Yes, it is, but my interest in catalyst is not the interest of |
| 9 |
> > Catalyst maintainers. |
| 10 |
> > I think that in order to take it one step forward, it should be forked. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> sounds like you've never even talked to the catalyst maintainers. i |
| 13 |
> have. he said "send patches". he doesnt have a problem adding |
| 14 |
> cross-compile support. |
| 15 |
> -mike |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Hi Mike, |
| 19 |
Here is a bug I have added in 2011-02-22: |
| 20 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355995 |
| 21 |
Catalyst don't check correctly for openrc. this cause no running of depmod, |
| 22 |
and you find this when you boot the machine. |
| 23 |
Until now, I got no response. |
| 24 |
If it's my problem, please correct me. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Kfir |
Archives