| 1 |
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 23:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 22 September 2006 20:15, Natanael Copa wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The biggest differences is the debian style /etc/network/interfaces (I |
| 4 |
> > use busybox stuff rather than trying to port the zillions gentoo |
| 5 |
> > gawk/bash specifics) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> i wouldnt bother with the Gentoo network stuff from baselayout ...what we have |
| 8 |
> is very powerful, dont get me wrong ... it's just that if you're size |
| 9 |
> conscious, then your target hardware is probably going to have a very static |
| 10 |
> network setup which means you can just hand write the friggin stuff and be |
| 11 |
> done |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Then I think alpine-baselayout would be perfect for gentoo-embedded. It |
| 14 |
uses busybox heavily (mdev instead of udev etc). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I can submit an ebuild to bugzilla (on monday) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
btw... We are building a webconf to alpine, using haser/lua. Since most |
| 19 |
configfiles are gentoo configs, it will probably work on gentoo-embedded |
| 20 |
too. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> -mike |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives