On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 03:37, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
[snip]

> > > I have also sent all my specs/patches (not really sorted) for reference to 
> > > solar (3.5MB compressed), he will probably put them online, all were 
> > > tested with ET_DYN/propolice.
> > 
> > I mirrored your work to this location some time ago.
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/rpm_specs/
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/gcc-etdyn-3.3.x.specs.diff
> 
> Haven't you got the new ones (with patches too)?
> 

I guess I don't have these (new ones with patches) or they are lost in
my thousands of unread mails..  However I'm happy to mirror them again.


> Peter
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Thanks very much in advance,
> > > > 
> > > > Alexander
> > > 
> > > Peter
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:23, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorry for cross-posting, 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have rebuilt a full system (x86) with uClibc and hardened-gcc 
> > > > > (ET_DYN/PIE and stack-protection 3.3.2-5) binaries and booted into it 
> > > > > (kernel built with -fstack-protector). Only the packages with assembler 
> > > > > code have problems with ET_DYN/PIE, grub has problems with 
> > > > > stack-protection.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Peter
> > > > 
> > 
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Gentoo Linux Developer