Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-embedded
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-embedded@g.o
From: tserra@...
Subject: Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:38:06 +0000
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 16:23:13 +0100
Vano D <gentoo-dev@...> wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 20:52, Chris PeBenito wrote:
> > > For these embedded systems it would be nice if we had a
> > > baselayout-lite.  I'm not convinced every init script for these tiny
> > > processors needs to source 300+ lines of bash functions to just
> > 
> > I agree with this.  I'm not sure if it would be better to maintain our
> > own baselayout-lite, or if it would be better to try to make an option
> > for the current baselayout to make a tiny install.  My instincts tell me
> > the former, but I don't think it would be too fun to maintain. :\
> 
> I think we can try to do both and see which one is the best method and I
> guess dump the worst method. Right now I dont think it is easy to see
> which one is the best method (unless there is someone around who has
> experience in tweaking Gentoo for embedded and can let us know).
> 
> Maintaining a simple stripped down baselayout-lite should not be *that*
> hard since I guess it would be a rather small and simple package (I dont
> know why I keep on thinking of simple rc files ala slackware all the
> time). 
> 
> But on the other hand, having a script which strips/modifies the current
> standard baselayout also seems interesting. But this depends on how
> often the main baselayout goes through drastic changes (which is not
> that often iirc).
> 
> So my vote is trying both methods and see what results we get.

I believe it would be more practical striping the existing baselayout, making a lite one. After that we only need to keep track of advances in the main baselayout package and focus on adding features/modifications in the lite.

> -- 
> Vano D <gentoo-dev@...>
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list


-- 
[-- Tiago Serra (aka cha0s)


-- Key fingerprint: FC58 3001 1A0A 985E 9851  F428 1164 2F0B 8D66 2596
-- Pub key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8D662596

Grand Master Turing once dreamed that he was a machine. When he awoke he
exclaimed:

"I don't know whether I am Turing dreaming that I am a machine, or a
machine dreaming that I am Turing!"

--]

Attachment:
pgpSy7H8EtPbh.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
-- Vano D
Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
-- david
Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
-- Chris PeBenito
Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
-- Vano D
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
Next by thread:
Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
Previous by date:
Re: glibc and standard baselayout minimalist installation
Next by date:
Cross compiler tool chain scripts and tool for embedded environments


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-embedded mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.