1 |
On 22 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 07:03, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
4 |
> > Hello! |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > 1. perl-5.8.4 misses the uclibc changes |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > 2. perl-5.8.4 does not work w/ ndbm provided by berkdb (neither on glibc) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> <rac> solar: DB_File (which uses ndbm internally) works fine here |
11 |
> <rac> solar: my little bit of futzing around with lcars on wasabi used |
12 |
> that berkeley db interface extensively, and was all done on 5.8.4) |
13 |
> <solar> Can you Re: that and say.. provide a test case? |
14 |
> <rac> solar: i can't keep up with all my gentoo mailing list email as it |
15 |
> is, and can't add another mailing list. can you ask them to file a bug? |
16 |
|
17 |
it's not DB_File (that is pure Berkeley DB) |
18 |
NDBM_File (compat libs) is recognised by 5.8.2, but not by 5.8.4, so |
19 |
either the test fails running configure, or something else changed (tested |
20 |
against db-4.1.25_p1) |
21 |
|
22 |
> > 3. miscfiles using compressed files will work only if cracklib gets |
23 |
> > compressed file support, else cracklib can't use them |
24 |
> Ok there seems to be a logic error in your patch. The 644 mode never |
25 |
> took place. |
26 |
> I'm fixing this up and put it into the -r7 in a few mins. |
27 |
|
28 |
well, I'll wait for the logic error ;) |
29 |
|
30 |
> Note: for now we have to use uclibc? ( app-arch/gzip ) |
31 |
|
32 |
ok for now |
33 |
|
34 |
> > 4. db4 could also get a c++ disable option (for uclibc) |
35 |
> > 5. my not-answered question: will gcc get a c++ flag? |
36 |
> |
37 |
> oh.. this one is going to be tricky ;/ |
38 |
|
39 |
than we would need subpackaging, to separate out c++ and libstdc++ from |
40 |
the main gcc package |
41 |
|
42 |
Peter |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |