Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] other uclibc related issues
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:35:23
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0406222310210.17419-100000@nb.bridge.intra
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] other uclibc related issues by Ned Ludd
1 On 22 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 07:03, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
4 > > Hello!
5 > >
6 > > 1. perl-5.8.4 misses the uclibc changes
7 >
8 > > 2. perl-5.8.4 does not work w/ ndbm provided by berkdb (neither on glibc)
9 >
10 > <rac> solar: DB_File (which uses ndbm internally) works fine here
11 > <rac> solar: my little bit of futzing around with lcars on wasabi used
12 > that berkeley db interface extensively, and was all done on 5.8.4)
13 > <solar> Can you Re: that and say.. provide a test case?
14 > <rac> solar: i can't keep up with all my gentoo mailing list email as it
15 > is, and can't add another mailing list. can you ask them to file a bug?
16
17 it's not DB_File (that is pure Berkeley DB)
18 NDBM_File (compat libs) is recognised by 5.8.2, but not by 5.8.4, so
19 either the test fails running configure, or something else changed (tested
20 against db-4.1.25_p1)
21
22 > > 3. miscfiles using compressed files will work only if cracklib gets
23 > > compressed file support, else cracklib can't use them
24 > Ok there seems to be a logic error in your patch. The 644 mode never
25 > took place.
26 > I'm fixing this up and put it into the -r7 in a few mins.
27
28 well, I'll wait for the logic error ;)
29
30 > Note: for now we have to use uclibc? ( app-arch/gzip )
31
32 ok for now
33
34 > > 4. db4 could also get a c++ disable option (for uclibc)
35 > > 5. my not-answered question: will gcc get a c++ flag?
36 >
37 > oh.. this one is going to be tricky ;/
38
39 than we would need subpackaging, to separate out c++ and libstdc++ from
40 the main gcc package
41
42 Peter
43
44
45 --
46 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] other uclibc related issues Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>