| 1 |
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:06, José Alberto Suárez López wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> So is not an easy solution right now. If you have a nice idea send my a |
| 4 |
> patch for gnap. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Thanks! |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
For me the most vital option is connlimit and ipset as I cannot create solid |
| 9 |
rock router without it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I expected gnap would solve this issue as it was designed for devices like |
| 12 |
routers. A very neat idea is to have a kernel with path-o-matic already |
| 13 |
applied in Portage :-) And I guess it doesn't have to be in general Portage |
| 14 |
but only in limited gnap Portage (although it would limit the audience). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The open question is if there is a poor soul to maintain such ongoing task :-] |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Janusz |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives