| 1 |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Christoph Spielmann <spielc@×××××.com>wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Am 03.01.2011 10:21, schrieb Kfir Lavi: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> On Sunday, January 02, 2011 13:59:43 Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 12 |
>> > Kfir Lavi wrote: |
| 13 |
>> > > crossdev i686-gentoo.edge-linux-gnu |
| 14 |
>> > |
| 15 |
>> > .. |
| 16 |
>> > |
| 17 |
>> > > CBUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu |
| 18 |
>> > |
| 19 |
>> > I'm pretty sure you should use i686-pc-linux-gnu as the crossdev |
| 20 |
>> > tuple then. I don't think making up arbitrary tuples works. |
| 21 |
>> (gentoo.edge) |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> the vendor field is supposed to be arbitrary and the only char that |
| 24 |
>> should |
| 25 |
>> cause a split is a "-". not that we test every char though, so there |
| 26 |
>> might be |
| 27 |
>> bugs sitting around that most people dont notice. |
| 28 |
>> -mike |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
> I tried it again running |
| 31 |
> crossdev i686-gentoo-linux-gnu |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Once again, wrong vendor field: It really should be i686-pc-linux-gnu as |
| 35 |
> Mike suggested |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> and got the same results. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> What can be wrong with my setup? |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Thanks, |
| 43 |
> Kfir |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> What I did is funny: |
| 47 |
CBUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu |
| 48 |
HOSTCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
So it seems I'm using my native compiler?! |
| 51 |
And I'm not using my i686-gentoo-linux-gnu-gcc |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Can I see which compiler is really working if I change CBUILD to |
| 54 |
i686-gentoo-linux-gnu? |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Thanks, |
| 57 |
Kfir |
Archives