Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@×××××××××.se>
To: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] quickpkg and PKG_INSTALL_MASK
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:48:54
Message-Id: OF49D9C032.484B317F-ONC1257975.0035B63F-C1257975.0035DFE0@transmode.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] quickpkg and PKG_INSTALL_MASK by solar
1 solar <solar@g.o> wrote on 2011/12/26 21:38:52:
2 >
3 > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 19:03 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
4 > > solar <solar@g.o> wrote on 2011/12/25 18:52:52:
5 > > >
6 > > > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:34 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
7 > > > >
8 > > > >
9 > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
10 > > > > <joakim.tjernlund@×××××××××.se> wrote:
11 > > > >
12 > > > > I got the impression from docs that PKG_INSTALL_MASK would
13 > > > > actually
14 > > > > mask files out so they never get into the binary package, this
15 > > > > doesn't
16 > > > > seem to happen.
17 > > > > Did I misunderstand? If I did, I think an MASK to do the above
18 > > > > would be a worthy addition to quickpkg, very useful for
19 > > > > embedded targets to keep the pkg size down.
20 > > > > Also PKG_INSTALL_KEEP which would list files keep(rest is
21 > > > > dropped) would be nice.
22 > > > >
23 > > > > Oh, something else I wonder about. How does pre/post install
24 > > > > work with
25 > > > > quickpkgs? Is it possible to have such scripts and then have
26 > > > > qmerge execute
27 > > > > them?
28 > > > >
29 > > > > Jocke
30 > > > >
31 > > > >
32 > > > > Yes, PKG_INSTALL_MASK on time of installation will mask the files
33 > > > > defined in it.
34 > > > > Binary package do contain all files, even the masked files.
35 > > > > Kfir
36 > > >
37 > > >
38 > > > $PKG_INSTALL_MASK is supposed to omit the files in it's list from making
39 > > > it into the binary pkgs in the first place. The idea there was to make
40 > > > smaller binary pkgs for embedded devices and such (for use only with
41 > > > private repos).
42 > > >
43 > > > $INSTALL_MASK is supposed to omit the files listed in it from being
44 > > > installed on the file system.
45 > >
46 > > Hi Solar, long time no see :)
47 > >
48 > > So the current behaviour is a bug, good to know.
49 >
50 > I would not really call it a bug. *INSTALL_MASK is a portage feature
51 > itself. quickpkg does not support all the features of portage itself.
52 > You could/should file a feature request bug for quickpkg to add such
53 > support. Maybe file a bug for portage-utils@ as well because I just
54 > checked and looks like we never added support for PKG_INSTALL_MASK in
55 > qpkg.c (c version of quickpkg)
56
57 I did file a bug, got some answer too. See bug 396315
58
59 Jocke