Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:53:48
Message-Id: 20051101145239.GD30547@toucan.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM by Douglas Campos
1 On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:13:23PM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
2 > Ned Ludd wrote:
3 >
4 > >On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:34 -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
5 > >>I've heard 6 months ago that this combination wasn't possible.
6 > >>
7 > >>Is it true today?
8 > >
9 > >Its doable with .28 but the upgrade paths from .27 are not so smooth.
10 >
11 > is there any big caveats? as far as i know, .28 is hardmasked by
12 > profile, but don't know why :(
13
14 probably because it'll eat your .27 env for lunch if we unmasked it
15 -mike
16 --
17 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM Douglas Campos <qmx2352@×××××.com>