Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-embedded
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Embedded Gentoo Mail List <gentoo-embedded@g.o>, Gentoo Development Mail List <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: Bryan Duff <duff0097@...>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping arm?
Date: 18 Jan 2004 12:08:21 -0600
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 08:20, Michael Imhof wrote:
> Hi Sven,
> 
> Sven Blumenstein wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I just want to throw in this question:
> > 
> > Should we drop the arm arch?
> > 
> > Just to summarize some facts why this question goes through my head:
> > 
> > - afaik we have no arm developer as they all went to zynot
> > - a great amount of DEPEND.bad archs are caused by [~]arm keyworded 
> > packages
> > - is anyone actually using Gentoo on arm?
> What about this gentoo for zaurus anouncement?
Yeah, these guys:

http://www.opensistemas.com/Gentoo_for_Zaurus.715.0.html

This is exactly what I personally have been wanting for gentoo and
handhelds.
> Wouldn't this be gentoo on arm?
Yes it would be.  This would also include a number of Hp Ipaq's too.

> 
> 
> Regards
> Michael
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
> 
Bryan Duff
duff0097@...
You have to run as fast as you can just to stay where you are. If you
want to get anywhere, you'll have to run much faster. -- Lewis Carroll 


--
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-embedded: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
New dev: dragonheart
Next by thread:
How far along is this project?
Previous by date:
New dev: dragonheart
Next by date:
How far along is this project?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-embedded mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.