Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
Cc: Alexander Gabert <pappy@g.o>, gentoo-embedded@g.o, gentoo-hardened@g.o, uclibc@××××××.org, etoh@××××××.com
Subject: [gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 17:46:27
Message-Id: 1071013454.780.118.camel@simple
In Reply to: [gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status by "Peter S. Mazinger"
1 On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:43, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
2 > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Alexander Gabert wrote:
3 >
4 > > hi Peter,
5 > >
6 > > would you be able to submit your finale patches for the uclibc you
7 > > modified?
8 >
9 > You could wait a little, the pie patches could go into 0.9.24 (if Erik
10 > will do it), else take the patches I have sent to the uclibc list
11 > yesterday as tar.bz2 (not the separated ones sent earlier). The flipturn
12 > patch from gentoo is mostly included into uClibc cvs, the remaining part
13 > is attached.
14 > I am enforcing NOELFRELOCS like behaviour in uClibc (I have it in
15 > PaX/grsec too like this), this could not be conformant to what you want
16 > to do. Really tested is the config with CTOR_DTOR enabled, the disabled
17 > version works on "Hello world" as ET_DYN, no other tests done.
18 >
19 > > I would love to include it in the Gentoo uclibc to make it able to be
20 > > used with our unique propolice implementation!
21 > The propolice implementation is what you've done with move-to-glibc, not
22 > the new ssp_x86 (waiting further more for an answer on the file you've
23 > sent me ;-( )
24 >
25 > I have also sent all my specs/patches (not really sorted) for reference to
26 > solar (3.5MB compressed), he will probably put them online, all were
27 > tested with ET_DYN/propolice.
28
29 I mirrored your work to this location some time ago.
30 http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/rpm_specs/
31 http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/gcc-etdyn-3.3.x.specs.diff
32
33 >
34 > > Thanks very much in advance,
35 > >
36 > > Alexander
37 >
38 > Peter
39 >
40 > >
41 > > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:23, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
42 > > > Hello!
43 > > >
44 > > > Sorry for cross-posting,
45 > > >
46 > > > I have rebuilt a full system (x86) with uClibc and hardened-gcc
47 > > > (ET_DYN/PIE and stack-protection 3.3.2-5) binaries and booted into it
48 > > > (kernel built with -fstack-protector). Only the packages with assembler
49 > > > code have problems with ET_DYN/PIE, grub has problems with
50 > > > stack-protection.
51 > > >
52 > > > Peter
53 > >
54 --
55 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
56 Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>