On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:43, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> > hi Peter,
> > would you be able to submit your finale patches for the uclibc you
> > modified?
> You could wait a little, the pie patches could go into 0.9.24 (if Erik
> will do it), else take the patches I have sent to the uclibc list
> yesterday as tar.bz2 (not the separated ones sent earlier). The flipturn
> patch from gentoo is mostly included into uClibc cvs, the remaining part
> is attached.
> I am enforcing NOELFRELOCS like behaviour in uClibc (I have it in
> PaX/grsec too like this), this could not be conformant to what you want
> to do. Really tested is the config with CTOR_DTOR enabled, the disabled
> version works on "Hello world" as ET_DYN, no other tests done.
> > I would love to include it in the Gentoo uclibc to make it able to be
> > used with our unique propolice implementation!
> The propolice implementation is what you've done with move-to-glibc, not
> the new ssp_x86 (waiting further more for an answer on the file you've
> sent me ;-( )
> I have also sent all my specs/patches (not really sorted) for reference to
> solar (3.5MB compressed), he will probably put them online, all were
> tested with ET_DYN/propolice.
I mirrored your work to this location some time ago.
> > Thanks very much in advance,
> > Alexander
> > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:23, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Sorry for cross-posting,
> > >
> > > I have rebuilt a full system (x86) with uClibc and hardened-gcc
> > > (ET_DYN/PIE and stack-protection 3.3.2-5) binaries and booted into it
> > > (kernel built with -fstack-protector). Only the packages with assembler
> > > code have problems with ET_DYN/PIE, grub has problems with
> > > stack-protection.
> > >
> > > Peter
Ned Ludd <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer