1 |
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> if that's the way upstream gnuconfig/gcc has gone, then it doesnt make much |
3 |
> sense to try and fight the tide. it's just a name. |
4 |
|
5 |
Meh, I'm not really focusing on the 'Android' userspace right now |
6 |
anyway, but the patches were easy enough. My bionic ebuild currently |
7 |
does not distinguish between -android* and -bionic*. I'm mainly |
8 |
interested in getting a Gentoo userspace up and running in any case. |
9 |
|
10 |
I just successfully got a gcc / bionic cross-toolchain built with |
11 |
crossdev (no c++ yet). x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -> x86_64-pc-linux-bionic. |
12 |
The toolchain is okay aside from linking. It's still looking for the |
13 |
glibc-type crt files. For bionic they're named differently and there |
14 |
isn't an exact 1-1 mapping: crtend_android.o, crtbegin_so.o, |
15 |
crtend_so.o, crtbegin_static.o. It would be nice. |
16 |
|
17 |
Also, my bionic ebuild currently leverages the Android build system |
18 |
heavily, which I would prefer _not_ to do, but it seems |
19 |
counter-productive right now to reinvent the wheel with autotools. |
20 |
(volunteers?) |
21 |
|
22 |
Is anyone interested in having a look yet? I guess I could post it on |
23 |
gitorious as a layman overlay. |
24 |
|
25 |
Cheers, |
26 |
|
27 |
C |