| 1 |
On ons, 2005-11-23 at 07:32 -0200, Douglas Campos wrote: |
| 2 |
> In the old days, we started with a static toolchain to build the uclibc |
| 3 |
> (a la buildroot), then re-bootstraps everything with the new uclibc as libc |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I ask: in the case of uclibc-0.9.28 (aka 2006.0) what will be done? |
| 6 |
> google doesn't helped a lot. |
| 7 |
> I know that uclibc-0.9.28 breaks binary compatibility. |
| 8 |
> How to do the major update in a gentoo-way? |
| 9 |
> catalyst breaks, /usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh breaks, emerge -e |
| 10 |
> system breaks.... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If anyone can help, I will be grateful |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I am also interested in this. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I am also wondering if anyone have an idea about how long time it will |
| 17 |
take before the uclibc-0.9.28 gets marked as stable. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We will probably start moving a libc based system over to uclibc in |
| 20 |
january. I hope to use gentoo as a base for this, but I would prefer to |
| 21 |
wait til 0.9.28 get stable to avoid another bigger update. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Natanael Copa |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives