From: | Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-embedded@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic | ||
Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:03:50 | ||
Message-Id: | BANLkTin9yHq8srmO5NBiJ=GKquZV=YC=yw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic by Arkadi Shishlov |
1 | On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Arkadi Shishlov |
2 | <arkadi.shishlov@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > What is the (long-term) technical advantage to use bionic, compared to glibc |
4 | > and uclibc? |
5 | |
6 | There really is little technical advantage over glibc or uclibc. Most |
7 | would probably argue the opposite. For most embedded applications, I |
8 | would actually suggest using uclibc instead of bionic. |
9 | |
10 | The (short- and long-term) advantage really just lies in the license. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic | Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@×××××.com> |