1 |
Christopher Friedt wrote: |
2 |
> Hi James |
3 |
> |
4 |
> wireless wrote: |
5 |
>> Has anyone built/hacked embedded gentoo onto a coldfire? |
6 |
>> Minimalistic or kernel plus a few packages would be ok. |
7 |
>> Has anyone even attempted to put some subset of embedded |
8 |
>> gentoo onto a coldfire? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I would suggest trying crossdev with the target: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> m68k-softfloat-uclinux-uclibc |
13 |
> |
14 |
> See http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=1&chap=3 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> If it's supported directly in the linux kernel, then you might be able |
17 |
> to just use |
18 |
> |
19 |
> m68k-softfloat-linux-uclibc |
20 |
> |
21 |
> but I'm not sure if that will work. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Use uclibc for sure (no mmu). uClibc also has a dynamic / shared object |
24 |
> loader as well, which was developed in recent years, so even on mmu-less |
25 |
> systems you can still use functions analogous to dlopen(), dlsym() (AFAIK). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Of course, whether or not the patchsets are incorporated is another |
28 |
> story, but since Coldfire is a pretty well ironed-out architecture, I'm |
29 |
> sure you won't have any issues. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Using portage as a build tool for mmu-less systems is a great idea in my |
32 |
> opinion. I would suggest using Ned's crossdev-wrappers as well (search |
33 |
> the list). |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
Yea, I still researching my options. |
37 |
Also, the are continuing to beef up the |
38 |
performance of the high end chips, in the coldfire |
39 |
family. |
40 |
|
41 |
When I figure out what I'm going to do, I'll drop |
42 |
a note on the list, to let anyone comment on the |
43 |
approach. |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
Thanks, |
47 |
|
48 |
James |