Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: wireless <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Coldfire
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:38:14
Message-Id: 48C1526B.9090405@tampabay.rr.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Coldfire by Christopher Friedt
1 Christopher Friedt wrote:
2 > Hi James
3 >
4 > wireless wrote:
5 >> Has anyone built/hacked embedded gentoo onto a coldfire?
6 >> Minimalistic or kernel plus a few packages would be ok.
7 >> Has anyone even attempted to put some subset of embedded
8 >> gentoo onto a coldfire?
9 >
10 > I would suggest trying crossdev with the target:
11 >
12 > m68k-softfloat-uclinux-uclibc
13 >
14 > See http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=1&chap=3
15 >
16 > If it's supported directly in the linux kernel, then you might be able
17 > to just use
18 >
19 > m68k-softfloat-linux-uclibc
20 >
21 > but I'm not sure if that will work.
22 >
23 > Use uclibc for sure (no mmu). uClibc also has a dynamic / shared object
24 > loader as well, which was developed in recent years, so even on mmu-less
25 > systems you can still use functions analogous to dlopen(), dlsym() (AFAIK).
26 >
27 > Of course, whether or not the patchsets are incorporated is another
28 > story, but since Coldfire is a pretty well ironed-out architecture, I'm
29 > sure you won't have any issues.
30 >
31 > Using portage as a build tool for mmu-less systems is a great idea in my
32 > opinion. I would suggest using Ned's crossdev-wrappers as well (search
33 > the list).
34
35
36 Yea, I still researching my options.
37 Also, the are continuing to beef up the
38 performance of the high end chips, in the coldfire
39 family.
40
41 When I figure out what I'm going to do, I'll drop
42 a note on the list, to let anyone comment on the
43 approach.
44
45
46 Thanks,
47
48 James