| 1 |
On tir, 2005-12-27 at 13:02 -0500, solar wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: |
| 3 |
> > There were some kind of conflict some time ago related to NLS in |
| 4 |
> > glibc-2. It resulted in glibc-2 got masked. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> You mean glib2 vs glibc? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
ofcourse (sorry) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. |
| 15 |
> This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem |
| 16 |
> moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I had the feeling that this is not a technical problem. (from the |
| 19 |
bugzilla) It would be nice if it could be worked out. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> > Are the problems solved in uclibc-0.9.28? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Yes & No. |
| 24 |
> .28 has better support and could probably handle it. |
| 25 |
> ie built in iconv() handling and basic locales handling. |
| 26 |
> It's just not very ideal or mature at all. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Natanael Copa |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives