| 1 |
On Monday, January 03, 2011 07:17:35 Christoph Spielmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 03.01.2011 10:21, schrieb Kfir Lavi: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sunday, January 02, 2011 13:59:43 Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Kfir Lavi wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > crossdev i686-gentoo.edge-linux-gnu |
| 7 |
> > > > CBUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > I'm pretty sure you should use i686-pc-linux-gnu as the crossdev |
| 10 |
> > > tuple then. I don't think making up arbitrary tuples works. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > (gentoo.edge) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > the vendor field is supposed to be arbitrary and the only char |
| 15 |
> > that should |
| 16 |
> > cause a split is a "-". not that we test every char though, so |
| 17 |
> > there might be |
| 18 |
> > bugs sitting around that most people dont notice. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > I tried it again running |
| 21 |
> > crossdev i686-gentoo-linux-gnu |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Once again, wrong vendor field: It really should be i686-pc-linux-gnu as |
| 24 |
> Mike suggested |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
mmm i didnt suggest that. there really isnt such a thing as "wrong" vendor |
| 27 |
field -- it's supposed to be pretty flexible. we use "gentoo" for the vendor |
| 28 |
field with all uclibc targets for example. |
| 29 |
-mike |
Archives