| 1 |
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:49, Janusz Syrytczyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:06, José Alberto Suárez López wrote: |
| 3 |
> > So is not an easy solution right now. If you have a nice idea send my a |
| 4 |
> > patch for gnap. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Thanks! |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> For me the most vital option is connlimit and ipset as I cannot create |
| 9 |
> solid rock router without it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I expected gnap would solve this issue as it was designed for devices like |
| 12 |
> routers. A very neat idea is to have a kernel with path-o-matic already |
| 13 |
> applied in Portage :-) And I guess it doesn't have to be in general Portage |
| 14 |
> but only in limited gnap Portage (although it would limit the audience). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The open question is if there is a poor soul to maintain such ongoing task |
| 17 |
> :-] |
| 18 |
For work I'm keeping GNAP scripts and a small portage tree reasonably up to |
| 19 |
date. I plan on making it available sometime soon. However I haven't had the |
| 20 |
need to patch the kernel yet. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz) |
Archives