Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
> > We're kicking around the idea of creating profile(s) for the systems,
> > which would obviously have the bare minimum for operation and would be
> > using uClibc.
> >
> I'd suggest you use glibc at the moment. A uClibc-based build will be
> incompatible with all the pre-existing binaries.
I think it's very worthwhile to support both glibc and uclibc (and maybe
dietlibc). Not all embedded systems have very tight space constraints.
I'm working on a system here that I'm going to have 64meg of flash for
the system. I don't need to get all that tight.
--Justin
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
|
|
