Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Douglas Campos <qmx2352@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:18:31
Message-Id: 436786F9.9080507@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] uClibc and PAM by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2
3 >On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:13:23PM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>Ned Ludd wrote:
7 >>
8 >>
9 >>
10 >>>On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:34 -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
11 >>>
12 >>>
13 >>>>I've heard 6 months ago that this combination wasn't possible.
14 >>>>
15 >>>>Is it true today?
16 >>>>
17 >>>>
18 >>>Its doable with .28 but the upgrade paths from .27 are not so smooth.
19 >>>
20 >>>
21 >>is there any big caveats? as far as i know, .28 is hardmasked by
22 >>profile, but don't know why :(
23 >>
24 >>
25 >
26 >probably because it'll eat your .27 env for lunch if we unmasked it
27 >-mike
28 >
29 >
30 point.
31 --
32 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list