1 |
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 05:42, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
2 |
> On 26 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Please test with this patch. If it works for you then I'll open a bug |
5 |
> > and request the dev-portage@ team cvs commit it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> it works for me |
8 |
|
9 |
great... I was thinking that maybe the logic should be inverted from an |
10 |
"no"autoFEATURE to an autoFEATURE. The logic there would be. Reduce the |
11 |
number of bugs that could arise from the change. (ie only people who opt |
12 |
for such behavior will want it anyway) And not to override changes made |
13 |
by a previous call to gnuconfig_update. Seem sane? |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
> |
17 |
> Peter |
18 |
> |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
21 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |