Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
Cc: toolchain@g.o, gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] latest changes for uclibc mainly
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:50:50
Message-Id: 1088340361.8348.2318.camel@simple
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] latest changes for uclibc mainly by "Peter S. Mazinger"
1 On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 05:42, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
2 > On 26 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:
3 >
4 > > Please test with this patch. If it works for you then I'll open a bug
5 > > and request the dev-portage@ team cvs commit it.
6 >
7 > it works for me
8
9 great... I was thinking that maybe the logic should be inverted from an
10 "no"autoFEATURE to an autoFEATURE. The logic there would be. Reduce the
11 number of bugs that could arise from the change. (ie only people who opt
12 for such behavior will want it anyway) And not to override changes made
13 by a previous call to gnuconfig_update. Seem sane?
14
15
16 >
17 > Peter
18 >
19 --
20 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
21 Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] latest changes for uclibc mainly "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>