| 1 |
Quoting Sebastian Pipping (2012-09-25 23:56:39) |
| 2 |
> On 09/24/2012 10:07 PM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I haven't got any further reply. Do you agree with me? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I'd start with a tool which will generate usage help, man page, |
| 6 |
> > example config file and bash case..esac option handler from a nice |
| 7 |
> > single template. Next I'll proceed with Genkernel4/5. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't support your choice of Bash. No offense, I will not be part |
| 10 |
> of this. If you go forward, please apply software testing (which |
| 11 |
> genkernel has always been lacking) and try to build something that |
| 12 |
> people can use early, long before it's complete. Good luck. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Do you mean kind of automatic tests suites? There's not much to do with |
| 15 |
it, because as I said the most complex part of Genkernel would be split |
| 16 |
off and start as Geninitramfs. Genkernel is going to be an integrator |
| 17 |
of kernel and initramfs builders. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If not you, does anybody support my plans? I wouldn't be happy if I |
| 20 |
expend my time and nobody is interested in contribution and testing. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Amadeusz Żołnowski |
Archives