1 |
On Tue, 2007-09-10 at 23:54 +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> This is the thing I'm waiting for atm ... the functions to implement (ie |
4 |
> the API)... I think, that it should be done in a functional way is |
5 |
> general consensus, isn't it? |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
Ok, I've put together a small list of portage calls mostly unigue, but |
9 |
many have variations of the basic call (not listed)repeated for |
10 |
different info returned. A few lines of code I left in to make it more |
11 |
clear, but should give an overall list of the portage function calls |
12 |
used so far. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
I will put together a list of functions that I created in portagelib to |
16 |
add functionality directly related to portage. Some of them are copies |
17 |
of code chunks from lifted from gentoolkit. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Regards, |
20 |
> - - Necoro |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net> |