-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> On Mon, 2007-08-10 at 19:52 +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>> At the beginning of next week, I'm planning to make portato use this new
>>> amazing backend :). We'll see if this is going to work... (Rumors say
>>> that currently dbus times out on the first connect...)
>> As promised, I finished a portato version which is using the new
>> catapult backend... (Btw - the rumor has been proved being wrong ;))
>> You can get the code doing:
>> svn co https://svn.origo.ethz.ch/portato/trunk
>> or you can install portato with catapult support:
>> 1. layman -o http://portato.sourceforge.net/layman.xml -f
>> 2. layman -o http://portato.sourceforge.net/layman.xml -a portato
>> 3. USE="catapult" emerge -av "=portato-9999"
>> Now another question occurs: Am I the only one interested in this
>> project? Because there is nearly no feedback/suggestions/discussions
>> (except with bheekling in IRC)
>> - - Necoro
> One of the things that I did was to create a separate db module. In the
> past much of it was incorporated into our portagelib. That makes it
> more difficult to change back-end, package managers and update code for
> changes from upstream. So far your catapult back-end is creating a
> package object for your front-end. That may be fine for a fully
> integrated program, but now you are separating it out into it's own
> process and passing that structure to your front-end. I don't know if
> dbus is passing references (pointers) or making copies. I think that
> there is potential for large memory leaks that way. Also portholes
> definition of a package object is different than portato's as I'm sure
> kuroo's and himerge's is. I believe that the back-end should be
> restricted to only interfacing the front-end to the package manager
> enquiries along with some utility code for odds and ends to provide a
> more complete back-end service. By odds and ends I mean code chunks
> needed to be able to provide missing features/functions of the different
> package managers we may support.
That's right, different front-ends have different package object
representation. One of my idea was to write an initial library (probably
on C so it can easily be used through many languages) , creating a set
of sharable procedures between front-ends, this also could give us some
ideas of how far a general package object representation is possible
between the different front-ends ; i think that'd be a good way to start
building this project.
> I think that pothole's potagelib.py contents is more of what a back-end
> should provide. I'll be the first to admit (I'm biased) it needs work
> and cleanup and there is room for it to grow/improve. I do not think
> that it should be providing package structures with embedded package
> manager calls. I think it should be restricted to the basic data types
> returned by the package managers. Any more complex structures should be
> handled by the front-end code or any intermediate code it uses.
Right, I also agree that this back-end should only generate general data
that can be easily shared by many front-ends so they can handle these
objects in whatever way fits better for each one. Now, the question is,
what kind of data exactly would this be?, it's here where i think the
library project would help to figure this out. But as to give an initial
idea, this library could be usable by any kind of portage front-end (no
only graphical) and should be easily used through different tools.
> Anyway... my thoughts so far. How about the others? What do you see as
> your needs of a back-end?
> Another question, I have subscribed to the gentoo-guis list. Is
> everyone else that is interested also? Should we just use that list for
> now? So I/we don't get 4 or five copies of an email from different
Yes, We are using this mailing list to discuss this project, so, anyone
interested on this subject, please subscribe to it.
> As for IRC, I'm not that big on it. Also I'm in the Canada/US Pacific
> time zone, Necoro I believe is in Europe. That usually means when I'm
> going to bed, he's just coming online and vice versa.
Don't worry about that, everyone is spread around the globe, if you have
some time, try to stop by it too and say hi :-)
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
email@example.com mailing list